Examining How Religion is Addressed During Preoperative Stoma Counseling.

INTRODUCTION: An intestinal stoma creation is one of the most common surgical procedures. Despite benefits, a stoma can have serious effects on a patient's quality of life. Multiple dimensions of everyday life can be affected such as social life, body image, as well as ability to participate in some religious practices, with some faith groups being disproportionately affected. This study sought to understand the extent to which faith is addressed during these sessions given the integral role it plays for some patients. METHODS: A survey was developed based on literature review and expert consultation. This was distributed to ostomy certified nursing staff, inflammatory bowel disease gastroenterologists and colorectal surgeons caring for patients requiring a permanent stoma at a high-volume academic institution. Follow-up semistructured interviews were conducted to delve deeper into themes identified in the surveys. RESULTS: The overall survey response rate was 57%. Only 35% reported training on how stomas interface with religious practices. Religious services were either rarely or never present during preoperative counseling discussions. During interviews, it was noted that religious beliefs often impact after care but are not always discussed during preoperative sessions. Interviewees found these conversations to be difficult with minimal support or direction on how to navigate them. CONCLUSIONS: Although very important, health-care providers are not including faith-based issues surrounding stomas in perioperative counseling partly due to lack of training or awareness of existing support systems. As our population diversifies, understanding cultural and religious practices that influence care is increasingly important.

Residency Application Advising: Medical Student & Faculty Advisor Perceived Barriers & Expectations.

INTRODUCTION: Given the rapidly changing landscape of residency applications, many medical students struggle to identify guidance from faculty advisors. Additionally, faculty advisors may find it difficult to maintain up-to-date knowledge on changes such as the new supplemental application. These gaps could potentially lead to inequitable advising. The objective of this study was to identify both students' and faculty's perceived barriers and expectations for residency application advising. METHODS: Anonymous surveys were administered to both fourth-year medical students and faculty advisors at a single institution within 2 mo of the residency application deadline. Survey questions assessed student and faculty barriers to establishing the advisor-advisee relationships, as well as expectations of the advisor role. Surveys were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: We identified that the majority of students (57%) did not have a faculty advisor within weeks of the application deadline, and an equal amount felt that finding an advisor was either somewhat difficult or extremely difficult. Of all the students, 60% felt their biggest barrier was not knowing how to find an advisor. Though faculty felt equipped to advise students, 75% of faculty in the participating specialties had advising concerns regarding the supplemental application or were unaware of the changes. CONCLUSIONS: We identified gaps in the residency application advising process from both student and faculty perspectives. Future work involves increasing awareness of the resources and opportunities available to students to improve advising relationships. Standardized training tools and resources for faculty will result in more consistent and reliable faculty advising.

"You've Got Gratitude!"- A Multispecialty and Multi-institution Program Encouraging Expressions of Gratitude.

OBJECTIVE: Efforts to improve physician well-being have focused on gratitude, which predicts health and happiness. Despite reported benefits, expressions of gratitude in healthcare can seem infrequent. Here, we describe Gratitude-Grams, an intervention to cultivate expressions of gratitude throughout a department. METHODS/APPROACH: Piloted in our Department of Surgery and adopted by others, Gratitude-Grams employs a web-based platform (Qualtrics). Program feedback was solicited during teaching conferences using an anonymous department survey. RESULTS: Gratitude-Grams streamlines and encourages expressions of gratitude while minimizing maintenance, cost, and time. The platform has been highly utilized and well-received in our Department of Surgery. CONCLUSION: Expressing and receiving gratitude has been shown to be critical for well-being. Gratitude-Grams is a highly utilized, simple, and attainable system to support expressions of gratitude and is ready for rapid implementation.

Negotiation and Career Advancement: How Can We Continue to Advance Women in Academic Surgery, What Are the Barriers They Are Facing, and What Can We Do to Overcome Them?

Despite increasing female representation in U.S. medical schools, women remain underrepresented in academic surgery departments across the country. Even as the gap narrows in academic surgery, female surgeons' professional advancement does not parallel that of their male counterparts. This article explores how to continue to advance women in academic surgery, first by considering the barriers women surgeons face, then offering actionable steps-on the individual, interpersonal, and systems levels-to overcome these barriers and work toward gender equity.

Elucidating academic surgical staff perspectives of medical student learning in the operating room: An embedded mixed methods study.

BACKGROUND: The operating room (OR) is a complex environment for medical students. Little is known about the OR staff's perception of medical students. METHODS: We utilized an embedded mixed methods design to characterize surgical staff perceptions of students at an academic institution. We surveyed 408 OR nursing/technician staff with 16 follow-up interviews. RESULTS: 139 respondents. 91.3% reported having daily-to-weekly interactions with medical students. Yet, only 37.9% agreed that "patient care is better when medical students are part of the team." 25.2% felt confident that they knew what a student's education entails outside the OR. 93.5% agreed that interprofessional training between physicians and OR staff should be included in educational programs. 54% agreed that their responsibilities include medical student training in the OR setting. CONCLUSIONS: Despite an overall desire for teamwork, this study highlights a lack of knowledge of each others' roles. To improve OR culture and team dynamics, concerted efforts need to be made around interprofessional training.

Incivility, Work Withdrawal, and Organizational Commitment Among US Surgeons.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of incivility among trainees and faculty in cardiothoracic surgery, general surgery, plastic surgery, and vascular surgery in the U.S, and to determine the association of incivility on job and work withdrawal and organizational commitment. BACKGROUND: Workplace incivility has not been described in surgery and can negatively impact the well-being of individuals, teams, and organizations at-large. METHODS: Using a cross-sectional, web-based survey study of trainees and faculty across 16 academic institutions in the U.S., we evaluated the prevalence of incivility and its association with work withdrawal and organizational commitment. RESULTS: There were 486 (18.3%) partial responses, and 367 (13.8%) complete responses from surgeons [including 183 (56.1%) faculty and 143 (43.9%) residents or fellows]. Of all respondents, 92.2% reported experiencing at least 1 form of incivility over the past year. Females reported significantly more incivility than males (2.4 ± 0.91 versus 2.05 ± 0.91, P < 0.001). Asian Americans reported more incivility than individuals of other races and ethnicities (2.43 ± 0.93, P = 0.003). After controlling for sex, position, race, and specialty, incivility was strongly associated with work withdrawal (ß = 0.504, 95% CI: 0.341-0.666). There was a significant interaction between incivility and organizational commitment, such that highly committed individuals had an even greater impact of incivility on the outcome of job and work withdrawal (ß = 0.178, 95% CI: 0.153-0.203). CONCLUSIONS: Incivility is widespread in academic surgery and is strongly associated with work withdrawal. Leaders must invest in strategies to eliminate incivility to ensure the well-being of all individuals, teams, and organizations at-large.

Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening in US Immigrants: A Scoping Review.

INTRODUCTION: Timely colorectal cancer (CRC) screening has been shown to improve CRC-related morbidity and mortality rates. However, even with this preventative care tool, CRC screening rates remain below 70% among eligible United States (US) adults, with even lower rates among US immigrants. The aim of this scoping review is to describe the barriers to CRC screening faced by this unique and growing immigrant population and discuss possible interventions to improve screening. METHODS: Four electronic databases were systematically searched for all original research articles related to CRC screening in US immigrants published after 2010. Following a full-text review of articles for inclusion in the final analysis, data extraction was conducted while coding descriptive themes. Thematic analysis led to the organization of this data into five themes. RESULTS: Of the 4637 articles initially identified, 55 met inclusion criteria. Thematic analysis of the barriers to CRC screening identified five unique themes: access, knowledge, culture, trust, health perception, and beliefs. The most cited barriers were in access (financial burden and limited primary care access) and knowledge (CRC/screening knowledge). CONCLUSIONS: US immigrants face several barriers to the receipt of CRC screening. When designing interventions to increase screening uptake among immigrants, gaps in physician and screening education, access to care, and trust need to be addressed through culturally sensitive supports. These interventions should be tailored to the specific immigrant group, since a one-size-fits approach fails to consider the heterogeneity within this population.

The Michigan Action Progress System (MAPS): Enhancing a Culture of Professionalism, Accountability, and Psychological Safety.

OBJECTIVE: To prioritize trainee well-being, promote professionalism, and allow individuals to raise concerns without fear of retribution, one surgical department created an innovative process by which individuals can raise concerns and obtain subsequent support. DESIGN AND SETTING: The University of Michigan Department of Surgery implemented the Michigan Action Progress System (MAPS) in February 2021. PARTICIPANTS: General Surgery residents, faculty, and staff voluntarily participate in MAPS. RESULTS: Since implementation, there have been 26 entries into MAPS. Petitioners included students (10, 38%), residents and fellows (7, 27%), staff (1, 4%), faculty (1, 4%), and anonymous petitioners (7, 27%). Concerns regarding racism (1, 4%), bullying (11, 52%), gender discrimination (1, 4%), and other incidents (8, 38%) were addressed though MAPS. CONCLUSIONS: We have successfully implemented an innovative system that focuses on the needs of the user, consolidates handling of concerns, and emphasizes transparency, documentation, education, and improvement to promote a culture of professionalism and accountability.

The Hidden Burden: Qualitative Differences in How URiM Students Experience the Clinical Microenvironment.

INTRODUCTION: It is well documented that medical students who identify as underrepresented in medicine are more likely to encounter social challenges in the clinical environment. Successful navigation of these challenges requires a social and emotional agility that is unmeasured in traditional metrics of success. The effects of this requirement has not yet been explored. The authors therefore set out to investigate the variations in experiences that exist between underrepresented minority students in medicine (URiM) and white students, and to determine if there was a difference in the quantitative performance evaluations applied to both groups of students. METHODS: This was a mixed-methods study. In the quantitative portion, the authors retrospectively analyzed the standardized patient encounter scores of medical students from a single medical school in Michigan during the years of 2016 to 2018. The authors used multivariable ordinary least squares regression models to evaluate the differences in scores by race. In the qualitative portion, students volunteered to be interviewed and self-identified their race and gender. The authors employed semi-structured interview techniques to gather information about how the student felt their cultural or ethnic background affected their experience in the clinical environment. RESULTS: For the quantitative portion of this study, the authors analyzed the scores of 534 students over 4 different standardized patient encounters. The average score across all 4 standardized patient encounters was 88.7 (SD=5.6). The average score across all 4 standardized patient encounters for white students was 89 (SD=5.3), Black 87.9 (SD=7.4) Twenty-four students participated in the semi-structured interviews. Participants described feeling that the way their assessors interacted with them was largely affected by their race or gender. They also described feeling tension between how they would usually express themselves and how they were expected to in the clinical environment. When probed further, participants described various methods of adaptation to this tension including changing their hair or natural style of speech and modifying their perception of their role in the clinical environment.

Demographic Factors Associated With Research and Career Interests in Aspiring Academic Surgeons: What are the Implications for Tomorrow's Workforce?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the research and career interests of aspiring academic surgeons and determine the influence of demographic factors. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey SETTING: Single institution, academic general surgery residency program PARTICIPANTS: Medical students invited to interview during 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 residency cycle RESULTS: One hundred fifty-four of 160 (96%) potential respondents representing 63 medical schools completed the survey, American Association for Public Opinion Research Response Rate 6. Fifty-three percent of the study population was female. Seventeen percent identified as Black, 14% Asian, 13% Latinx, 50% white, and 6% other. Respondents were most interested in education, professional development, and surgical culture (32%) followed by basic and translational science (23%), global and community health (20%), and health services (18%). On multiple logistic regression, interest in global/community health was associated with identifying as Black (OR 5.9 [2.0, 17.8] p = 0.001) and female (OR 2.7 [1.0, 7.0] p = 0.044). A plurality of participants were undecided on future specialty (n = 63, 41%). The most common specialty interests were surgical oncology (n = 28, 18%); trauma, acute care, or surgical critical care (n = 21, 14%); pediatric and cardiothoracic surgery (n = 20 for each, 13%); and abdominal transplant (n = 15, 10%). CONCLUSIONS: In this cross-sectional survey of highly competitive academic general surgery applicants, respondents who were underrepresented in medicine (URiM) and women were more interested in research fields with a history of lower relative NIH funding. In light of these findings, academic programs seeking a more diverse residency workforce should consider strategies beyond recruitment to promote the scholarly achievement of women and URiM residents.

How We Do It: An Innovative General Surgery Mentoring Program.

OBJECTIVE: The taxing nature of surgery residency is well-documented in the literature, with residents demonstrating high rates of burnout, depression, suicidal thoughts, sexual harassment, and racial discrimination. Mentoring has been shown to improve camaraderie, address challenges of underrepresentation in medicine, and be associated with lower burnout. However, existing formal mentoring programs tend to be career-focused and hierarchal without opportunity to discuss important sociocultural issues. An innovative approach is needed to address these cultural and anthropological issues in surgery residencies while creating camaraderie and learning alternative perspectives across different levels of training. We sought to describe the framework we used to fill these needs by creating and implementing a novel mentoring program. DESIGN: A vertical, near-peer mentoring system of 7 groups was created consisting of the following members: 1 to 2 medical students, a PGY-1 general surgery resident, a PGY-4 research resident, and a faculty member. Meetings occur every 3 to 4 months in a casual setting with the first half of the meeting dedicated to intentional reflection and the second half focused on an evidence-based discussion regarding a specific topic in the context of surgery (i.e., burnout, discrimination, allyship, and finding purpose). SETTING: Program implementation took place at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, MI. PARTICIPANTS: Medical students, general surgery residents, and general surgery faculty were recruited. CONCLUSIONS: We have successfully launched the pilot year of a cross-spectrum formal mentoring program in general surgery. This program emphasizes camaraderie throughout training while providing opportunities for evidence-based discussion regarding sociocultural topics. We have included increased opportunities for community inclusivity and mentoring while allowing trainees and faculty members to discuss sensitive topics in a supportive environment. We plan to continue developing the program with robust evaluation and to expand the program to other surgical specialties and to other institutions.

Observations by health care professionals about wound healing in Ghanaian patients who skin-bleach.

Skin-bleaching is a common practice globally and is associated with many cutaneous and systemic health risks. Anecdotally, skin-bleaching is linked to impairments in wound healing, but there are little data to support the claim. This cross-sectional survey of health care professionals serving the Greater Accra Region, Ghana region investigates their observations of wound healing in patients who skin-bleach and their methods for screening skin-bleach use in patients. A 25-item self-administered questionnaire using 5-point Likert scale was distributed with convenient sampling to physicians and nurses employed at Ghanaian hospitals. Fifty-seven electronic and 78 paper responses were collected (total = 135). Most respondents agreed that wounds in skin-bleaching patients heal more slowly (4.22), are more prone to infection (4.11), haemorrhage (3.89), wound dehiscence (3.9), and are more difficult to manage (4.13). No respondent reported universal screening of all patients for skin-bleaching, but most ask about skin-bleaching if there is suspicion of it (42.2%). Our findings support the anecdotes about observable wound healing impairments in patients who skin-bleach. There is also wide variation in skin-bleaching screening practices, suggesting a need for guidelines to properly identify these patients and facilitate early risk prevention.